logo
   Web Issue 3231 August 20 2008   
spacer
Expert study finds MMR jab has no link with autism

JANE KIRBY

There is no link between the controversial MMR jab and autism, according to the largest ever published study on the issue.

Fears over an association between the two in the late 1990s led to a drop in the number of children having the combined vaccine for mumps, measles and rubella.

Research on 12 children published in the medical journal The Lancet in 1998 suggested a link between the jab, autism and bowel disease.

Lead author Dr Andrew Wakefield is currently appearing before the General Medical Council on charges relating to the claims.

Today's research involved a sample of almost 250 children aged between 10 and 12, born between July 1990 and December 1991 in the south Thames area of England.

The experts noted that two previous studies have reported raised concentrations of measles antibodies in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

Their study sought to find out if this was true.

The researchers said they wanted to "test the hypothesis that measles vaccine was involved in the pathogenesis of ASD, as evidenced by signs of a persistent measles infection or abnormally persistent immune response shown by circulating measles virus or raised antibody titres in MMR-vaccinated children with ASD compared with controls".

The study was published in the journal Archives of Disease in Childhood.

It followed 98 children who had an autism spectrum disorder and two comparison groups: 52 children with special educational needs but no evidence of ASD, and 90 children who were normal.

All the children had been vaccinated against MMR, but not all of them had been given both the doses needed for maximum immunity.

Blood samples were taken from all the children to check for persistent measles infection, or an abnormal immune response. This was indicated by a circulating measles virus or increased antibody levels.

The results showed there was no difference in virus or antibody levels between children with ASD and the comparison groups. This finding was unaffected by whether or not the child had received both MMR doses or whether or not they had regressed (where children appear to develop communication skills, but then regress).

However, children with special educational needs and those with autism were least likely to have received the second dose, perhaps because their parents refused the second dose after their child developed abnormal symptoms.

The study also found no evidence of bowel symptoms (enterocolitis) among the autistic children, irrespective of whether or not they had regression.

The researchers included experts from Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust in London, King's College London, Manchester University and the Health Protection Agency (HPA).

They concluded: "No difference was detected in the distribution of measles antibody or in measles virus in ASD cases and controls whether the children had received the first, second or both MMR vaccinations. This remained true when the analysis was restricted to ASD cases with a history of regression."

Professor David Salisbury, director of immunisation at the Department of Health, said: "I hope that this study will reassure (parents) that there is no evidence linking the MMR vaccine to autism."


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: Anne, Chicasaw on 1:11am Tue 5 Feb 08
The diagnosis of autism is based on three behavioural problems that are typical in autistic children and adults.
1. Social interactions
2. Verbal and non verbal communication
3. Tendency to exhibit repetitive behaviours and narrow, obsessive interests
Other areas of brain function include balance, movement and memory.

www.rarediseases.org to check FXS (Fragile X- syndrome)
Posted by: Anne, east o Mississsippi River on 1:21am Tue 5 Feb 08
The mercury-containing preservative thimerosal in vaccines in general was to blame.
Researchers compared records of children exposed to thimerosal while in the womb and those not exposed and no difference was found in autism rates. The study is one of the first to look at exposure to thimerosal during last months of pregnancy.
Posted by: Anne on 2:25am Tue 5 Feb 08
Nearly everything known about toxic effects of mercury is based on a form of mercury called methyl mercury. The same is found in large ocean fish - and causes developmental problems in children exposed to mercury through environmental disasters.

Ethyl mercury from vaccine preservative thimerol leaves the blood 10 times faster than methyl mercury, based on current risk assessments.
Inexpensive vaccines allowing poorer nations to afford to immunise their children still use thimerosal to prevent bacterial infection or contamination.

A 14 states study in the US revealed that Autism disorders are
"more common than previously believed"affeecting about one in
150 8-year-olds.
The 14 communities where the study have taken place are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin with prevalences varying.
New Jersey had the highest rate of
10.6 per 10,000 children; one in 94 - 8-year-olds
Alabama had the lowest rate of
3.3 per 10,000 children; one in 303 - 8-year-olds
The remaining 12 states ranging from
5.2 to 7.6 per 10,000 8-year-olds.
Autism Spectrum disorders include autistic disorder, Asperger's syndrom and pervasive developmental disorder.
Posted by: Anne on 2:52am Tue 5 Feb 08
10.6 per 10,000 children3.3 per 10,000 chidren 5.2 to 7.6 per 10,000

One zero too many, sorry, 10,000 =1,000
Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 4:55am Tue 5 Feb 08
Taony Balir never did take good advice. Then, he also sent his kids to private schools.
Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 4:55am Tue 5 Feb 08
Taony Balir never did take good advice. Then, he also sent his kids to private schools.
Posted by: Cynica, Eaglesham on 6:39am Tue 5 Feb 08
Where did the funding for this retrospective study come from?
Many of these investigations are financed by the drug companies making the medications.
It's not an especially large sample, either.
Posted by: IanDale, Glasgow on 10:34am Tue 5 Feb 08
But the sample number was twenty times that reported by Dr Wakefield - 240 subjects as against 12.
Posted by: IanDale, Glasgow on 10:34am Tue 5 Feb 08
But the sample number was twenty times that reported by Dr Wakefield - 240 subjects as against 12.
Posted by: Des, Glasgow on 10:37am Tue 5 Feb 08
Unfortunately this is of no comfort to parents with autistic children. Finding out what did not cause our children to develop autism is secondary to finding out what did cause it. I am sure though that this information will not be available in my life time or my sons.

Posted by: Neil 9% Growth, Glasgow on 10:43am Tue 5 Feb 08
240 is a far bigger sample than 12 but neither are nearly enough for the results to be above the basic statistical variation in any random sample. All such studies are nonsense pushed by the media on slow news days.

What is more interesting is the difference in the reaction to the studies purporting to show an MMR link to autism & those purporting to show links between passive smoke & cancer or salt & heart disease or CO2 emissions & global temperature.

The former is a scare story which seriously interferes with a state programme of immunising while the latter are scare stories which seriously assist the state in getting more power to tell us what to do.

Researchers in future would do well to learn from Dr Wakefield's treatment & stick to reporting only nonsense which supports state approved scare stories. The evidence is that most of them have done so.
Posted by: Janet, Glasgow on 11:03am Tue 5 Feb 08
What is controversial about the MMR other than that many educated middle class people fell for a scam and now do not want to admit it in case it makes them look stupid? If people in poor areas act or are seen to act in irresponsible ways regarding child heath there is only criticism not a sympathetic media hype.
Posted by: martin, edinburgh on 11:37am Tue 5 Feb 08
"240 is a far bigger sample than 12 but neither are nearly enough for the results to be above the basic statistical variation in any random sample"


That entirely depends on how strong a statistical 'signal' is picked up between the two groups. A faint correlation may require many thousands of subjects or never be picked up at all. On the other hand my experiment - 'People squeal more if they have a hammer dopped on their foot' - showed statistical significance after only 2 subjects.
Posted by: Anne on 12:12pm Tue 5 Feb 08
Autism was considered a brain condition that couldn't be changed, Marthe Herbert, a paediatric neurologist in Boston thinks of as dated and not right.
Andy Shih, vice president of scientific affairs at Autism Speaks at New York City - based nonprofit group aiming at increasing awareness of autism spectrum disorders and finding research into its causes, prevention and treatments, says "All are possibilities, but what we really need to is MORE RESEARCH assessing how interventions work and what children they work for".
He thinks that it is certainly a possibility whether the disorder is reversible.
Posted by: Economic Migrant, Darkest Oxfordshire on 2:11pm Tue 5 Feb 08
What is more interesting is the difference in the reaction to the studies purporting to show an MMR link to autism & those purporting to show links between passive smoke & cancer or salt & heart disease or CO2 emissions & global temperature.
.

The difference is the vast majority of doctors say MMR is safe and, the vast majority of scientists working in related fields say there is a link between CO2 emissions & global temperature.
Posted by: Anne, Ayrshire on 3:12pm Tue 5 Feb 08
Autism: A "why "Question You Don't want To Answer

www. youtube.com/watch? v=7RZSM5IgzGk
Posted by: Neil 9% Growth, Glasgow on 3:22pm Tue 5 Feb 08
Fair but slightly nit picking point Martin.

All the studies with major differences like smoking causes lung cancer, driving while drunk doesn't work as well, sub- Saharan Africans have average IQs of 70, few sunspots correlate with cold weather, have all been done. The ones getting reported now all depend on a a marginal change of maybe 10 or 20% which is not enough to mean anything.

"This would tend to imply that small studies are quite useless. This is not quite true. They are worse than useless. They are positively malign. These are the studies that make the headlines in the popular media, are seized on by Spcial interst fanaticss to aid their propaganda and used by authoritarian politicians and bureaucrats to impose draconian regulation. They build up the publication portfolios of third-rate academics, who become professors on the strength of them and corner precious research money that ought to go to real science. They belittle science in the eyes of the general public by continually contradicting each other."

from http://www.numberwat
ch.co.uk/2003%20July
.htm#cat

Posted by: Neil 9% Growth, Glasgow on 3:25pm Tue 5 Feb 08
Or as EM so well puts it - it is fine to produce reports that support politically correct "consensii" but not ones that dispute them.
Posted by: Chris D, Edinburgh on 11:26pm Tue 5 Feb 08
Did Leo Blair have the MMR? Will we ever find out if the Blairs were as convinced by the argument for the vaccine as they apparently should have been. I doubt it.
Posted by: Anne, of Green Gables, L. Montgomery on 12:12am Wed 6 Feb 08
Did Leo Blair have the MMR?
Yes, he did, in the Winter of 2001, at a later date than was recommended by doctors.
Children should get vaccinated between the age of 12 and 15 months. Leo was born in May 2000.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Herald Appointments - Every Friday
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use